Source standard
Nutrition, calorie, litter, breed, and compliance claims should cite credible references. Product facts should be checked against current retailer, brand, or API data before being used in price-sensitive claims.
CatCost pages should provide original value through a calculator, formula, data table, cost model, scenario comparison, or methodology explanation. Generic pet content is outside the first version's focus.
Nutrition, calorie, litter, breed, and compliance claims should cite credible references. Product facts should be checked against current retailer, brand, or API data before being used in price-sensitive claims.
CatCost can compare cost, calories, package size, and usage assumptions. It should not claim that a product treats, prevents, or cures a condition.
Product comparison pages should show last-reviewed or last-checked dates. Stale, missing, suspicious, or incomplete data should be marked instead of hidden.
Corrections that affect formulas, package size, calorie math, prices, retailer links, or compliance language should be prioritized over cosmetic copy changes.
Product pages should start from measurable fit: package weight, calories, material group, price visibility, and data completeness. Sponsorship should not determine whether a row is included or how it is ranked.
CatCost pages should add analysis, calculation, transformation, or scenario modeling. A copied product title, a thin roundup, or a plain list of retailer links is not enough for the site.
If affiliate links are enabled, disclosures should appear before product links and close enough for readers to understand the relationship. Price and availability should be verified on the retailer page.